Comments on: Excelsior JET for Mac OS X and Other Interesting Questions

By: Dmitry Leskov

Dmitry Leskov — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:46:37 +0000

Adrian et al,

Thank you for expressing your interest. Any chance you help us finance the porting effort? Of the customers who completed the survey, almost 40% had expressed interest in the Mac OS X port, but only twelve people said they would pay for it in advance. Unfortunately, that is not enough.

By: Adrian

Adrian — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:25:09 +0000

I’ve expressed my interest in a Mac port before, and I’ll do it again – no Mac support is the only reason I haven’t chosen JET (yet). I know it’s alot of work for you guys, but I feel it would open up new markets.

By: Greg

Greg — Wed, 07 May 2008 23:32:11 +0000

We have an immediate commercial need to use excelsior compiled code on a Mac. In fact it’s holding up the check from the customer!

By: Daniel Neades

Daniel Neades — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:38:46 +0000

My company would be interested in this, too. We have a file comparison/merging application and a project management product, both of which use Java.

J2SE 6.0 support would be great, for the reasons mentioned by the previous poster.

By: Sage Salvatore

Sage Salvatore — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:07:34 +0000

We are interested in using JET if it is available with J2SE 6.0 on Mac OSX. With Apple lagging behind on their J2SE support this would give us ample opportunity to deploy Java 6 applications on Mac OSX.

By: Scott Ruoti

Scott Ruoti — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:53:38 +0000

My company would be very interested in using your product if it had compatibility with Mac OSX. Without this support the product lacks the functionality we need.