<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spring 2008 Excelsior JET Customer Survey Is Over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/news/spring-2008-excelsior-jet-customer-survey-is-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/news/spring-2008-excelsior-jet-customer-survey-is-over/</link>
	<description>Latest news and updates on Excelsior products and services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:58:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Leskov</title>
		<link>http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/news/spring-2008-excelsior-jet-customer-survey-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-1938</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Leskov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 11:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/?p=80#comment-1938</guid>
		<description>Maksim, 

I am sure there will be customers for the Mac OS X version of Excelsior JET. The point I was trying to make is that not all potential customers who say they would buy product X would actually do that when product X becomes available. 

Of course, if they pay in advance, or agree to share the risks &lt;b&gt;and&lt;/b&gt; profits, that&#039;s a totally different story. Perhaps we could try to set up a foundation of some sort.

We may not sell a product that has not passed the TCK. There is an option to pass the TCK in so called &lt;a href=&quot;http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2SE/Desktop/headless/ rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;headless mode&lt;/a&gt;, that is, without display, keyboard, mouse or sound. So we could port the core and let you rely on SWT for GUI. However, all people who have expressed interest in the Mac port up to this day were using Swing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maksim, </p>
<p>I am sure there will be customers for the Mac OS X version of Excelsior JET. The point I was trying to make is that not all potential customers who say they would buy product X would actually do that when product X becomes available. </p>
<p>Of course, if they pay in advance, or agree to share the risks <b>and</b> profits, that&#8217;s a totally different story. Perhaps we could try to set up a foundation of some sort.</p>
<p>We may not sell a product that has not passed the TCK. There is an option to pass the TCK in so called <a href="http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2SE/Desktop/headless/ rel="nofollow">&#8220;headless mode</a>, that is, without display, keyboard, mouse or sound. So we could port the core and let you rely on SWT for GUI. However, all people who have expressed interest in the Mac port up to this day were using Swing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maksim</title>
		<link>http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/news/spring-2008-excelsior-jet-customer-survey-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-1937</link>
		<dc:creator>Maksim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 11:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/?p=80#comment-1937</guid>
		<description>Dmitry, 

I am in no way challenging your business intuition and market expertise.  

Personally, I am now looking for oppotunities to optimize performance and deployment cost of OSGI-bundles on Mac OS X (and I don&#039;t care about awt). However I have no data if there is a critical mass of guys like me to allow you pay the bills.

However all these things considered, I am not sure that Oberon/Modula compiler many years ago can form a solid ground for marketing analysis of Java AOT compiler today. 

Furthermore (just a shameless dream) since reimplementing awt is very painful, maybe you can consider some flexible offering that allows to deploy certain stuff and yet not bearing the label &quot;100% fully certified pure java&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dmitry, </p>
<p>I am in no way challenging your business intuition and market expertise.  </p>
<p>Personally, I am now looking for oppotunities to optimize performance and deployment cost of OSGI-bundles on Mac OS X (and I don&#8217;t care about awt). However I have no data if there is a critical mass of guys like me to allow you pay the bills.</p>
<p>However all these things considered, I am not sure that Oberon/Modula compiler many years ago can form a solid ground for marketing analysis of Java AOT compiler today. </p>
<p>Furthermore (just a shameless dream) since reimplementing awt is very painful, maybe you can consider some flexible offering that allows to deploy certain stuff and yet not bearing the label &#8220;100% fully certified pure java&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Leskov</title>
		<link>http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/news/spring-2008-excelsior-jet-customer-survey-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-1936</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Leskov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 05:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/?p=80#comment-1936</guid>
		<description>Maksim, we have a very good reason to rely on paying customers&#039; opinion much more than on the opinion of would-be customers. 

Many years ago, we were selling a much simpler and much more portable product - command-line Modula-2/Oberon-2 &quot;via C&quot; compiler. (It is now known as XDS-C and is available as freeware.) We had versions for Windows, Linux, Sun OS, even Ultrix. And we have been receiving inquiries like &quot;I would buy your product if you port it to platform X.&quot; So we did the port to that platform and &lt;b&gt;did not sell a single copy&lt;/b&gt;. 

Now, you know what? That &quot;platform X&quot; was Apple Macintosh.

Considering also my previous comment, we may not afford the risk on our own at this time, and there are not enough people willing to share the risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maksim, we have a very good reason to rely on paying customers&#8217; opinion much more than on the opinion of would-be customers. </p>
<p>Many years ago, we were selling a much simpler and much more portable product &#8211; command-line Modula-2/Oberon-2 &#8220;via C&#8221; compiler. (It is now known as XDS-C and is available as freeware.) We had versions for Windows, Linux, Sun OS, even Ultrix. And we have been receiving inquiries like &#8220;I would buy your product if you port it to platform X.&#8221; So we did the port to that platform and <b>did not sell a single copy</b>. </p>
<p>Now, you know what? That &#8220;platform X&#8221; was Apple Macintosh.</p>
<p>Considering also my previous comment, we may not afford the risk on our own at this time, and there are not enough people willing to share the risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Leskov</title>
		<link>http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/news/spring-2008-excelsior-jet-customer-survey-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-1935</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Leskov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 05:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/?p=80#comment-1935</guid>
		<description>James, the compiler and the runtime are easy to port as Macs are now x86-based and Mac OS X has BSD Unix as its core. The problem is the standard library, most notably AWT. We have a license for the Sun&#039;s reference implementation of Java SE, so we just use their code in Windows and Linux version of Excelsior JET. But Apple did the port themselves, and they won&#039;t let us use their code. And the Windows AWT.DLL is over 900KB in size...

To put the long story short, the Mac port would be  at least an order of magnitude more expensive than the Linux port we&#039;ve done back in 2004.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, the compiler and the runtime are easy to port as Macs are now x86-based and Mac OS X has BSD Unix as its core. The problem is the standard library, most notably AWT. We have a license for the Sun&#8217;s reference implementation of Java SE, so we just use their code in Windows and Linux version of Excelsior JET. But Apple did the port themselves, and they won&#8217;t let us use their code. And the Windows AWT.DLL is over 900KB in size&#8230;</p>
<p>To put the long story short, the Mac port would be  at least an order of magnitude more expensive than the Linux port we&#8217;ve done back in 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maksim</title>
		<link>http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/news/spring-2008-excelsior-jet-customer-survey-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-1934</link>
		<dc:creator>Maksim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 20:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/?p=80#comment-1934</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s kinda strange to use the opinion of the existing WIndows-Unix customers to reason about Mac OS version. 

If you guys can deal with SWT Cocoa and RCP stuff in a smart way, you&#039;ll hit Mac OS market.

Btw, Java for IPhone is to be released this summer. Thus, a lot of developers will have an urgent need for slimming down their apps to deploy them on IPhone.

Pls, think about this. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s kinda strange to use the opinion of the existing WIndows-Unix customers to reason about Mac OS version. </p>
<p>If you guys can deal with SWT Cocoa and RCP stuff in a smart way, you&#8217;ll hit Mac OS market.</p>
<p>Btw, Java for IPhone is to be released this summer. Thus, a lot of developers will have an urgent need for slimming down their apps to deploy them on IPhone.</p>
<p>Pls, think about this. <img src='http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/news/spring-2008-excelsior-jet-customer-survey-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-1924</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/?p=80#comment-1924</guid>
		<description>Once you have a working version of the compiler in Linux, how difficult is it to port this to Macintosh?  Could I compile with the Linux compiler and run the code on a (x86) Macintosh already?

Thanks!
James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once you have a working version of the compiler in Linux, how difficult is it to port this to Macintosh?  Could I compile with the Linux compiler and run the code on a (x86) Macintosh already?</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SER</title>
		<link>http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/news/spring-2008-excelsior-jet-customer-survey-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-1923</link>
		<dc:creator>SER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excelsior-usa.com/blog/?p=80#comment-1923</guid>
		<description>I understand that Excelsior is working also on a 64-bit JET.  Please keep us updated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that Excelsior is working also on a 64-bit JET.  Please keep us updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
