Excelsior JET Benchmarks JFCMark
JFCMark™
is a series of performance tests
developed by Excelsior, LLC to measure and compare speed of JFC/Swing and
related APIs in various Java implementations.
JFCMark is a trademark of Excelsior, LLC.
|
| SYSTEM CONFIGURATION |
 |
| CPU: | | Intel Pentium IV with HyperThreading running at 2.40 GHz |
| RAM: | 512 MB |
| OS: | Windows 2000 Professional |
| Video: | RADEON 9200 SE 64MB at 1024x768x16777216c |
| RESULTS |
|
Results are provided for the problem size of 10 (immediate performance),
to illustrate the relative performance of a rich client application on
different VMs.
The result for each group of tests is the performance index in
comparison with the reference implementation (Sun HotSpot Client VM.)
Longer bar means better performance.
|
JET |
HSC |
HSS |
BEA |
|
unit of measurement |
|
JET |
HSC |
HSS |
BEA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ButtonDemo.LAF |
24.3 |
13.1 |
7.8 |
20.2 |
|
switch/sec |
|
186% |
100% |
60% |
155% |
| ButtonDemo.select |
14.3 |
13.9 |
13.6 |
14.0 |
|
select/sec |
|
103% |
100% |
98% |
101% |
| Average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145% |
100% |
79% |
128% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ImageDemo.Draw |
164.2 |
213.2 |
183.1 |
62.2 |
|
images/sec |
|
77% |
100% |
86% |
29% |
| ImageDemo.Load |
49.2 |
17.4 |
18.8 |
42.1 |
|
images/sec |
|
283% |
100% |
108% |
242% |
| ImageDemo.Transform |
40.0 |
14.7 |
17.8 |
39.4 |
|
switch/sec |
|
272% |
100% |
121% |
268% |
| Average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211% |
100% |
105% |
180% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| InternalFramesDemo.100 |
105.2 |
58.6 |
36.9 |
106.7 |
|
frames/sec |
|
179% |
100% |
63% |
182% |
| InternalFramesDemo.drag |
173.9 |
101.3 |
72.7 |
131.3 |
|
switch/sec |
|
172% |
100% |
72% |
130% |
| InternalFramesDemo.select |
134.7 |
69.1 |
54.5 |
128.2 |
|
select/sec |
|
195% |
100% |
79% |
186% |
| Average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182% |
100% |
71% |
166% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LayoutManagers.BoxLayout |
120.0 |
38.4 |
27.4 |
106.4 |
|
validates/sec |
|
313% |
100% |
71% |
277% |
| LayoutManagers.FlowLayout |
39.4 |
14.7 |
11.6 |
36.7 |
|
validates/sec |
|
269% |
100% |
79% |
250% |
| LayoutManagers.GridLayout |
28.4 |
11.6 |
10.9 |
30.1 |
|
validates/sec |
|
244% |
100% |
94% |
258% |
| LayoutManagers.OverlayLayout |
34.5 |
12.8 |
10.0 |
32.0 |
|
validates/sec |
|
269% |
100% |
78% |
250% |
| Average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274% |
100% |
81% |
259% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SourceCode.Load |
3.28 |
1.25 |
0.68 |
2.79 |
|
changes/sec |
|
262% |
100% |
54% |
222% |
| SourceCode.fineScroll |
446.76 |
404.31 |
372.67 |
446.76 |
|
scrolls/sec |
|
110% |
100% |
92% |
110% |
| SourceCode.rowScroll |
141.84 |
85.47 |
45.66 |
116.28 |
|
scrolls/sec |
|
166% |
100% |
53% |
136% |
| Average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179% |
100% |
67% |
156% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TableDemo.fineScroll |
505.9 |
295.6 |
263.2 |
479.2 |
|
scrolls/sec |
|
171% |
100% |
89% |
162% |
| TableDemo.rowScroll |
256.4 |
106.7 |
111.1 |
197.0 |
|
scrolls/sec |
|
240% |
100% |
104% |
185% |
| TableDemo.slide |
106.6 |
52.5 |
33.0 |
103.3 |
|
scales/sec |
|
203% |
100% |
63% |
197% |
| Average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205% |
100% |
85% |
181% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TreeDemo.AddRem |
150298 |
91032 |
76952 |
150298 |
|
add-rem/sec |
|
165% |
100% |
85% |
165% |
| TreeDemo.ExpColl_Deep |
5556 |
2080 |
1387 |
5200 |
|
expands + collapses/sec |
|
267% |
100% |
67% |
250% |
| TreeDemo.ExpColl_Wide |
30060 |
28095 |
17956 |
34471 |
|
expands + collapses/sec |
|
107% |
100% |
64% |
123% |
| Average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180% |
100% |
72% |
179% |
| Total Average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203% |
100% |
80% |
185% |
|
| SYSTEM CONFIGURATION |
|
| CPU: | | AMD Athlon XP running at 1.0 GHz |
| RAM: | 512 MB |
| OS: | Windows 2000 Advanced Server |
| Video: | S3 Virge DX/GX at 1024x768x16777216c |
| RESULTS |
|
Results are provided for the problem size of 10 (immediate performance),
to illustrate the relative performance of a rich client application on
different VMs.
The result for each group of tests is the performance index in
comparison with the reference implementation (Sun HotSpot Client VM.)
Longer bar means better performance.
|
JET |
HSC |
HSS |
BEA |
|
unit of measurement |
|
JET |
HSC |
HSS |
BEA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ButtonDemo.LAF |
4.8 |
5.1 |
3.4 |
4.8 |
|
switch/sec |
|
94% |
100% |
66% |
95% |
| ButtonDemo.select |
12.8 |
12.5 |
11.6 |
11.1 |
|
select/sec |
|
102% |
100% |
93% |
89% |
| Average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98% |
100% |
79% |
92% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ImageDemo.Draw |
13.3 |
13.4 |
13.5 |
11.1 |
|
images/sec |
|
99% |
100% |
100% |
83% |
| ImageDemo.Load |
23.0 |
9.6 |
9.8 |
20.5 |
|
images/sec |
|
241% |
100% |
103% |
215% |
| ImageDemo.Transform |
2.2 |
1.9 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
|
switch/sec |
|
115% |
100% |
103% |
113% |
| Average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152% |
100% |
102% |
137% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| InternalFramesDemo.100 |
31.5 |
25.0 |
17.1 |
29.7 |
|
frames/sec |
|
126% |
100% |
68% |
119% |
| InternalFramesDemo.drag |
22.5 |
21.1 |
18.8 |
22.2 |
|
switch/sec |
|
106% |
100% |
89% |
105% |
| InternalFramesDemo.select |
27.0 |
22.1 |
18.7 |
25.3 |
|
select/sec |
|
122% |
100% |
85% |
115% |
| Average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118% |
100% |
81% |
113% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LayoutManagers.BoxLayout |
25.3 |
16.6 |
12.0 |
24.0 |
|
validates/sec |
|
153% |
100% |
72% |
145% |
| LayoutManagers.FlowLayout |
6.4 |
5.0 |
4.2 |
6.4 |
|
validates/sec |
|
129% |
100% |
84% |
129% |
| LayoutManagers.GridLayout |
3.8 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
3.8 |
|
validates/sec |
|
120% |
100% |
96% |
119% |
| LayoutManagers.OverlayLayout |
6.2 |
4.4 |
4.1 |
6.2 |
|
validates/sec |
|
140% |
100% |
92% |
140% |
| Average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135% |
100% |
86% |
133% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SourceCode.Load |
2.51 |
0.96 |
0.41 |
1.97 |
|
changes/sec |
|
261% |
100% |
43% |
205% |
| SourceCode.fineScroll |
25.67 |
24.89 |
24.49 |
25.62 |
|
scrolls/sec |
|
103% |
100% |
98% |
103% |
| SourceCode.rowScroll |
16.00 |
14.21 |
10.94 |
15.42 |
|
scrolls/sec |
|
113% |
100% |
77% |
108% |
| Average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159% |
100% |
73% |
139% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TableDemo.fineScroll |
34.0 |
31.3 |
30.1 |
32.9 |
|
scrolls/sec |
|
109% |
100% |
96% |
105% |
| TableDemo.rowScroll |
23.1 |
19.8 |
19.5 |
19.2 |
|
scrolls/sec |
|
116% |
100% |
98% |
97% |
| TableDemo.slide |
15.8 |
13.2 |
10.0 |
14.7 |
|
scales/sec |
|
120% |
100% |
76% |
111% |
| Average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115% |
100% |
90% |
105% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TreeDemo.AddRem |
86177 |
46846 |
40151 |
76054 |
|
add-rem/sec |
|
184% |
100% |
86% |
162% |
| TreeDemo.ExpColl_Deep |
470 |
398 |
320 |
470 |
|
expands + collapses/sec |
|
118% |
100% |
80% |
118% |
| TreeDemo.ExpColl_Wide |
16904 |
15297 |
9542 |
16791 |
|
expands + collapses/sec |
|
111% |
100% |
62% |
110% |
| Average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138% |
100% |
76% |
130% |
| Total Average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132% |
100% |
84% |
123% |
|
